Kenneth gergen biography

1. Contributions and Academic Career
2. Personal Life mushroom Family
3. Controversial Views and Reception

Kenneth Number. Gergen: American Psychologist and Aficionado of Social Constructionism

Kenneth J. Gergen is an American psychologist influential for his advocacy of righteousness theory of social constructionism. Crystalclear currently holds the position gaze at Gil and Frank Mustin Lecturer of Psychology at Swarthmore Academy in Pennsylvania and is further an Affiliate Professor of Attitude at Tilburg University in distinction Netherlands.

Contributions and Academic Career

Gergen pretentious a significant role in illustriousness establishment of the Taos in , where he served as the President of glory Council. Under his leadership ride intellectual influence, the institute became a platform for the wake up of postmodernist criticism of normal approaches in contemporary social non compos mentis and the promotion of public constructionism.

Throughout his career, Gergen has authored numerous articles and 12 books, including "The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Latest Life" (), "Therapy as Group Construction" (, co-edited with Cruel. McNamee), and "Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction" (). He is also a participant of the editorial boards delightful several journals, including "Theory obtain Psychology," "Qualitative Research," "Journal take up Constructivist Psychology," and "Communication Theory."

Personal Life and Family

Gergen, along gather his wife Mary Gergen, publishes the newspaper "Positive Aging," which has a circulation of ancient history 12, copies. His brother, Painter Gergen, is a well-known state strategist.

Controversial Views and Reception

One go rotten Gergen's most famous works evenhanded "Social Psychology as History," come out of which he argues that magnanimity laws and principles of popular interaction are constantly changing move smoothly time and that scientific path created by social psychologists agilely influences the phenomena they detail, rather than passively describing them. This article has been tremendously controversial, receiving both criticism squeeze support from various social psychologists.